data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e1d1/6e1d14695276809f2f7bfa08f3efe1eae8973df2" alt=""
This is the latest dispute between Vinci Construction UK Ltd (“Vinci”) and Beumer Group UK Ltd (“Beumer”) to arise out of a Sub-Contract concerning development works at Gatwick Airport. In this case, Beumer sought to resist enforcement of an adjudicator’s […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3421d/3421db148724a8ac7fa7fceffaeb94aeeac6f73f" alt=""
Generally, claims brought outside the relevant limitation period will not be entertained by the courts. It is crucial therefore that parties know the date by which they must bring a claim. In the recent case of Swansea Stadium Management Company […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba717/ba717f26a025f7f0e8fb2a64d4b84dcacdaf27c5" alt=""
Last year, it was held in North Midland Building Ltd v Cyden Homes Ltd that the prevention principle did not take precedence over freedom of contract. North Midland Building Ltd (“NMB”) appealed and the case was brought before the Court […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba717/ba717f26a025f7f0e8fb2a64d4b84dcacdaf27c5" alt=""
The test for implying contractual terms was set out by the Supreme Court in Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd. Whilst that case settled what the test is, the application of that test […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba717/ba717f26a025f7f0e8fb2a64d4b84dcacdaf27c5" alt=""
Disputes regarding set-off against an adjudicator’s award are rare in enforcement proceedings. However, in the recent case of MI Electrical Solutions Limited (“MI”) v Elements (Europe) Limited (“Elements”) the court considered this very point. The decision highlights the difficulties which […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3421d/3421db148724a8ac7fa7fceffaeb94aeeac6f73f" alt=""
The principles governing the interpretation of contracts have been the subject of several recent cases in the Supreme Court and whilst those principles may now be settled it is clear that the application of them is far from simple. In […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf6e8/cf6e8923aecd50f80f83b1c128c3f46d1b3e405d" alt=""
In our article in May 2017 we considered the case of Goodlife Foods Limited (“Goodlife”) v Hall Fire Protection Limited (“Hall”) which concerned a widely drafted exclusion clause. In a unanimous decision, the Court of Appeal has now upheld that […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf6e8/cf6e8923aecd50f80f83b1c128c3f46d1b3e405d" alt=""
In the sixth first instance decision in the long-running dispute of Imperial Chemical Industries Limited (“ICI”) v Merit Merrell Technology Limited (“MMT”) the court assessed the quantum disputes between the parties. In an extensive judgment, the court considered a wide […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3421d/3421db148724a8ac7fa7fceffaeb94aeeac6f73f" alt=""
Contractor’s Liability for Design In SSE Generation Ltd (“SSE”) v Hochtief Solutions AG (“Hochtief”) the Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland considered the liability arising out of the collapse of a tunnel at a hydro-electric scheme. Although […]
Read Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba717/ba717f26a025f7f0e8fb2a64d4b84dcacdaf27c5" alt=""
The issues surrounding the enforcement of ‘No Oral Modifications’ (“NOM”) clauses has arisen yet again. It would appear however that it has now been finally determined. In our article in June 2016, we considered the effect of Globe Motors Inc […]
Read More